Is sufficient hopefuly the sharpnes is at least as good -). After scanning this negative withīoth scanners using Silverfast I got images 1 and 2, below. Of aluminium foil (from the kitchen -)), painted it black and taped it The scanner's step response with a negative I made by myself. I see no improvement in sharpness when the 3200 is used. Times to 4.3 times faster with increased sampling rate of 3200dpi, depending It is even faster than the Epson Scan with the
EPSON PERFECTION 3200 SCANNER SOFTWARE
You can see the individualĥ5mm x 55mm scanning area, 48bit mode, epson software Epson 2450, 2400dpi:ĥmin, 25s I use the scanner with Lasersoft's
EPSON PERFECTION 3200 SCANNER WINDOWS
Via firewire to an Intel 733MHz computer running Windows 2k, 1.5 GByteħ, I started the scan software from Photoshop. I tested only film mode as this is the mode I'll use with Settings of the resolution contain 1200dpi, 3200dpi, the setting of 2400dpi Twain 5.5" (3, below) but the new "Epson Scan 1.0" (4 and 5, below). This cannot be seen at the 3200, maybe just because When illuminated from the side, maybe coming from the plastic materials The glass of my 2450 looks as if it has some smear underneath Unit seems to be brighter to me eyes, but I did no measurement.Ĭlearer. Inside the negative, then close the cover again. Handling is a little bit more complicated, because you have to open a cover, This is a slight improvement because the film is more flat now, but the The film on all 4 sides, not only at two sides like it was with the 2450. It looks and feels a little bit cheaper to me. Received the Epson Perfection 3200 Photo, which I had ordered at the GermanĢ450, but the parts of the housing, which are light grey on the 2540 haveĪ silver hue at the 3200. Summary: much faster, maybe a little sharper (inconclusive). If you have questions for him, contact though the e-mail on his Of engineering at Gerhard Mercator Universität Duisburg in northern 2450 scan, 2400 dpi.īruck's impressions of the Epson Perfection 3200 scanner, mid-January, The 3200 seems to have an edge in sharpness, but it's not dramaticallyįull size (1:1) crop of the above image. Image is shown at the bottom, next to portion of the eye resized toĢ400 dpi. The original size wasĪ 1:1 crop of the eye is shown below. Provia 100F slide film, and scanned with the 3200. It was taken with the Bronica ETRS-i (645 format) on Perhaps I should put her to work on the killer strawberry weeds Kanarek sent me this very menacing image of Anaïs eating a Have reported problems with the sharpness of the 3200- manufacturing quality Surprisingly, the 4000 dpi CanoScan FS4000US is the sharpest. It's discontinued it's great for scanning panoramic images), and, not The HP S20 is better than either Epson scanner (too bad I can seeįine lines more clearly, but the image looks significantly grainier Iĭon't know why. My conclusions: The 3200 is slightly better than the 2400. I used a 3200 that belongs to Tim Butler, a young Have been resized to 4000 dpi (except, of course, the CanoScan).
In its software, and I did a little sharpening on the S20 scan. Has been applied to the scans, but there were no tonal adjustments. Taken on Kodak now-discontinued Supra 100 (negative film). XPan, 45 mm lens at f/8 or f/11 (close to optimum sharpness), tripod-mounted, Conditions: The image is from the Hasselblad Here is a comparison of the Epson 2450, Epson 3200 Hewlett-Packard S20,Īnd Canon CanoScan FS4000US.
Have a better idea when my 3200 (backordered) arrives.
Koren Summary: slightly sharper, but more visible grain (a mystery). Epson Perfection 3200 scanner: Impressions by Norman Koren, Benjamin Kanarek, and Guido Bruck Epsonīy Norman Koren, Benjamin Kanarek, and Guido Bruck
0 kommentar(er)
